Creating test plans for create, read, update and delete (CRUD) functionality is a very common requirement. There are a few different ways to model it. Let's review the simplest solution first then move to a few optional extra ideas that you could use in addition.
Option 1: Only one C, R, U, D action tested in each of your tests
Have one Parameter called "CRUD action" - have 4 different values: Create, Read, Update, Delete
Option 2: Include two CRUD actions in (most of) your tests
Create 2 Parameters, each with the following 4 and 3 Values:
First CRUD action: Create, Read, Update, Delete
Second CRUD action: Read, Update, Delete
You may want to add an invalid pair with the first CRUD action = Delete and each of the three values in the second CRUD action (in which case you'd need to add a 4th Value called N/A and leave it as the only available option for scenarios that deleted a record in the first test.
Option 3: Up to 4 CRUD actions in each of your tests
- Create a new record: create, don't create
- Read a record: read, don't read
- Update a record: update, don't update
- Delete a record: delete, don't delete
That's the most basic modeling decision. (e.g., one CRUD action / test, two CRUD actions / test, or potentially 4 CRUD actions / test).
What other things might be interesting to vary?
You might want to think about "newspaper reporter questions" - e.g., (who, what, when, where, why? how? how much?)
Which user type (or which system) is performing the CRUD ACTION? - Are certain types of users or systems not allowed to perform certain actions? Include test inputs to make sure they can't. Are others allowed to? Include test inputs in your model to make sure they can.
What kind of CRUD actions are being made? Valid ones? Invalid ones? How many invalid types of actions can you think of? What is supposed to happen when special characters are entered? What is supposed to happen when blanks are entered? What is supposed to happen when extremely long names are entered (e.g., are there concatenation rules?)
When are the updates being made? Are there any system downtimes? What happens to CRUD actions that are attempted then? What happens if the time stamp on a CRUD action is from the future? From the past? Originates in a different time zone?
When? ("version 2")
When are the CRUD actions tested in relation to one another? e.g., Update a record and then try to read it or read it and then try to update it? If you wanted to "mix up the order" of the Option 3 actions, for example, you could add a parameter called perform CRUD actions in what order? with values such as normal create then read then update then delete order, the reverse of the normal order as much as possible, start with read or update. This would not give you a "perfect solution" to cover every timing combination but it would lead to additional variability within your tests if you wanted them.
Why is a CRUD action being conducted? Do any interesting testing ideas come to mind when you think about this angle? How about bad or malicious motivations?
How are the actions being undertaken? By a keyboard? By a mouse? By a batch processing system?
Lastly, if you have an account you created on Hexawise.com, check out sample test plan "08. Modifications to a Database" for some additional ideas.
Bottom line: when test designers create tests (whether they use Hexawise to generate their tests or whether they select and document their tests by hand), they will have a lot of discretion over what kinds ideas to include / exclude from their tests. Using Hexawise offers these advantages over selecting tests by hand:
- You will maximize variation in your tests
- You will minimize wasteful repetition in your tests
- You will achieve 100% coverage of the combinations you tell the tool to include in your solution (e.g., pairwise testing coverage, three-way coverage, risk based testing coverage, etc.)
- You will be able to select those combinations and documented tester instructions faster and with fewer errors in the documented tests.
This post is based on a user question. See the Hexawise user forum page for some additional details related to the users follow up questions.
By: John Hunter and Justin Hunter on Dec 18, 2012